Page 9 of 18

Popular urbanization as an urban strategy. Decentring the vocabulary of urbanization

University of Applied Sciences Bremen – 2020

As result of a collaborative research project, this contribution introduces the concept of popular urbanization to describe a specific urbanization process based on collective initiatives, self‐organization and the activities of inhabitants. It discusses popular urbanization as an urban strategy through which an urban territory is produced, transformed and appropriated by the people. This concept results from a theoretically guided and empirically grounded comparison of Mexico City, Istanbul and Lagos. An important starting point for this new comparative conceptualization was the term urbanización popular, which is used widely in Latin America. In proposing the concept of popular urbanization for further examination, I seek to contribute to the collective development of a decentered vocabulary of urbanization.

Invited paper presented at the conference Latin American Urban Research in Dialogue: Urban Knowledge Production from the Region at the Bremen University of Applied Sciences taking place on October 19–20, 2020

More information about the conference here

Popular Urbanization: Conceptualizing urbanization processes beyond informality

IJURR – 2020

This article introduces the concept of popular urbanization to describe a specific urbanization process based on collective initiatives, self-organization and the activities of inhabitants. We understand popular urbanization as an urban strategy through which an urban territory is produced, transformed and appropriated by the people. This concept results from a theoretically guided and empirically grounded comparison of Mexico City, Istanbul and Lagos. Based on postcolonial critiques of urban theory and on the epistemologies of planetary urbanization, we bring urbanization processes in these urban regions into conversation with each other through a multidimensional theoretical framework inspired by Henri Lefebvre focusing on material interaction, territorial regulation, and everyday experience.

In this way, popular urbanization emerged as a distinct urbanization process, which we identified in all three contexts. While this process is often subsumed under the broader concept of ‘urban informality’, we suggest that it may be helpful to distinguish popular urbanization as primarily led by the people, while commodification and state agencies play minor roles. As popular urbanization unfolds in diverse ways dependent upon the wider urban context, specific political constellations and actions, it results in a variety of spatial outcomes and temporal trajectories. This is therefore a revisable and open concept. In proposing the concept of popular urbanization for further examination, we seek to contribute to the collective development of a decentered vocabulary of urbanization.

The article wins the IG Award 2020 awarded by the Swiss Network for International Studies for being an outstanding publication, accessible to a wider audience and particularly relevant for International Organisations.

Read article

Streule, Monika, Karaman, Ozan, Sawyer, Lindsay, Schmid, Christian (2020) Popular Urbanization. Conceptualizing urbanization processes beyond informality. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 44.4, 652–672. DOI:10.1111/1468-2427.12872

Introduction to the special issue »Contested urban territories: decolonized perspectives«

Special Issue Geographica Helvetica – 2020

This paper serves as an introduction to the »Contested urban territories: decolonized perspectives« special issue. The idea for this issue emerged during our reflections on a socioterritorial perspective, preeminent in the current Latin American analysis of contemporary urban struggles (Schwarz and Streule, 2016). It aims to contribute to these ongoing debates about a specific understanding of urban territories from a postcolonial and decolonized perspective by combining contributions from two paper sessions we organized at the 2017 meeting of the American Association of Geographers in Boston with additional papers by scholars who could not participate in the conference.

All seven contributions tackle the question of what a relational and dynamic conceptualization of territory may contribute to current debates in the urban studies field. Put more precisely, to which extent are socioterritorial approaches of value for a further decentering and pluralizing of urban theory? What is their significance to research on urban social movements? And, finally, how does such a socioterritorial perspective nurture and complement an analysis of the social production of space? The present special issue invites the reader to get familiar with new concepts and engage in a critical reflection on the conditions of knowledge production in urban geography and beyond.

Download article

Overview special issue (all contributions)

Schwarz, Anke and Monika Streule (2020) Introduction to the special issue »Contested urban territories: decolonized perspectives«. Geographica Helvetica, 75, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-75-11-2020

Decolonizing methods of urban research: innovative comparative urbanism, mobile ethnography, critical cartographies

Paul-Lazarsfeld-Professorship Seminar, University of Vienna – 2020

(course syllabus in German)

Im Kontext einer globalisierten Welt sind gesellschaftliche Fragen zunehmend komplex. Die Stadtforschung mit ihrem Ziel Urbanisierung weltweit zu analysieren steht beispielhaft für die großen Herausforderungen, mit denen Sozialwissenschafter*innen heute konfrontiert sind. Denn, die Stadt des 21. Jahrhundert gibt es nicht. Urbane Phänomene aber bestimmen den Alltag der Menschen und die Umwelt weltweit. Weiter gilt es, globale Ungleichverhältnisse kritisch zu reflektieren. Obwohl jedoch die Erforschung von Megastädten im Globalen Süden fest zur empirischen Forschungspraxis gehört, sind die dort vorhandenen Wissensbestände und Erfahrungen bislang kaum für die Theorieproduktion der Stadtforschung berücksichtig worden. Genau hier setzt die post- und dekoloniale Kritik ein und zeigt, dass nicht nur neue Theorien für eine zeitgenössische Analyse gefragt sind, sondern gerade auch die Weiterentwicklung methodischer Ansätze entscheidend ist um Stadt im Globalen Süden wie auch im Globalen Norden besser zu verstehen.

Die Vielfalt der Methoden ist breit im interdisziplinären Feld der Stadtforschung und umfasst quantitative, qualitative sowie mixed-methods Zugänge. Wie können solche hergebrachten Methoden im Zuge der erwähnten dekolonialen Kritik weiterentwickelt werden? Diese übergeordnete Frage leitet die vorgeschlagene Lehrveranstaltung an. Die Studierenden lernen in diesem Methoden-Seminar zentrale fächerübergreifende Debatten der aktuellen sozialwissenschaftlichen Methodendiskussion am Beispiel der Stadtforschung kennen und einordnen. Besonderen Fokus legt das Seminar auf drei etablierte Zugänge der Stadtforschung, nämlich der Vergleich, die Ethnografie sowie das Kartieren, und liefert Beispiele aus konkreten Forschungsprojekten, wie diese Methoden an aktuelle Forschungsfragen angepasst werden können.

Go to course catalogue