Page 7 of 19

Methods and methodologies of qualitative urban research

My commitment to apply innovative research to problems of social and political importance has formed the goal of my academic activities and research practices. Building on my doctoral and postdoctoral work, I strive to contribute to theoretical and methodological considerations about rapid urban transformation in the context of pressing issues to find new ways to deal with global social and environmental challenges. Inspired particularly by feminist and post- and decolonial scholarship, I aim to critically revise parochial conceptualizations and engage in the development of a variety of theoretical and methodological perspectives.

My book Ethnography of urban Territories (2018, Westfälisches Dampfboot) is a major output of my interdisciplinary approach and extensive fieldwork in Mexico City. The book provides insights into everyday forms of agency in urbanization and contributes to an understanding of the spatial dimension of society. The primary research presented is based on two main interests: on the one hand, a focus on understanding the predominant urbanization processes which have shaped the metropolitan territories of Mexico City in a historical as well as in a contemporary perspective. On the other hand, the scope of the research entailed developing and applying an interdisciplinary mixed set of methods to study urbanization processes empirically at large scale. In papers published in Urban Studies and FQS I discuss some of these findings.

Having extended field research experience, has turned positionality, self-reflexivity and ethnographic writing into key concepts of my research. My current research project Decolonizing ecology draws on my expertise in methods and methodologies of qualitative urban research, particularly on ethnography and cartography, and advances them with collaborative and dialogical approaches including mapping workshops and oral history interviews to co-produce urban knowledge and represent different practices together with indigenous urban communities and Latin America-based scholarship. Current ongoing academic collaborations include the Instituto de Investigaciones Socio-Económicas de la Universidad Católica Boliviana UCB, La Paz, and the Instituto de Geografía de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México UNAM, Ciudad de México.

Comparative urbanism and urbanization

My research builds on extensive experience in concept building through a comparative procedure in a broader research project Patterns and Pathways of Planetary Urbanization – including cases such as Mexico City, Lagos, Kolkata, Istanbul, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Paris, Los Angeles – based at the ETH Future Cities Laboratory Singapore and the Chair of Sociology, Department of Architecture at ETH Zürich. The comparison, conducted between 2011 and 2017, is based on a collective, interdisciplinary and transductive research process applying a qualitative methodological design that combines a wide variety of sources and procedures.

In repeatedly bringing situated insights from these diverse contexts in conversation with each other right from the outset of the project, it was possible to develop about a dozen comparative concepts of urbanisation that captured a number of common features and dynamics. As such, this comparison emanates from collaborative work, where the members of the team brought their disciplinary backgrounds and empirical research into a shared methodological framework, while allowing the evolving comparison to inform their own research. Project team members in alphabetical order are Naomi Hanakata, Pascal Kallenberger, Ozan Karaman, Anne Kockelkorn, Lindsay Sawyer, Christian Schmid, Monika Streule and Kit Ping Wong.

We published a series of co-authored papers in Urban Studies, IJURR, Antipode, Environment and Planning A, Planning Perspectives, City and FQS with results of this project demonstrating a comparative approach on detailed and situated analysis of daily practices reaching beyond a specific case study, opening a conceptual space to collectively build an extended vocabulary to understand urbanization crucial for urban studies more broadly. Together with Christian Schmid, I co-edited the book Vocabularies for an Urbanising Planet: Theory Building through Comparison (Birkhäuser 2023).

Green and grey: Nature in urban studies

Scientifica Zürcher Wissenschaftstage – 2021

In current urban research, nature is increasingly coming into focus as an important urban phenomenon. We present two different projects, both of which deal with comparable questions about sustainable urbanity: One project sheds light on how urban nature was discovered as well as designed in Zurich starting in the late 1970s and what social ideals are associated with it. The second project uses the examples of Mexico City and La Paz-El Alto in Bolivia to show the diverse relationships between people and nature as they are lived and demanded in urban social movements in Latin America.

Talk by Tobias Scheidegger &

Monika Streule

5th September, 2021 15:00 – 15:45

University Zurich Campus Irchel

Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich

Link to video recording

Talk together with Tobias Scheidegger in the framework of Scientifica – Zürcher Wissenschaftstage, 5th September 2021

Urban geography otherwise? Decentering academic knowledge production in praxis

RGS-IBG Annual Conference London – 2021

Today, many scholars are aware of the theoretically well-founded need to work towards more decentred urban knowledge production. However, the question often remains: How can this be put into practice? In this series of sessions, we take urban geography as a starting point to discuss the 2021 RGS-IBG conference theme ‘Borders, bordering and borderlands’. We draw on an emerging body of work in which urban scholars increasingly engage with a variety of decentred approaches in their research and academic praxis to ask how these practices and experiences shape the very scope and focus of urban theory.

Inspired by Gloria E. Anzaldúa’s Borderlands/La Frontera (1987), we propose to reflect on border-thinking as an approach to not only further decentre and reframe theoretical and methodological approaches in urban research, but also to recognize difference in knowledge production through critical feminist, race and intersectional perspectives. Opening up spaces in which encounters are possible is key to this endeavour, thereby creating interfaces and frictions between different urban knowledges. For instance, feminist and post- as well as decolonial scholars have proposed collaborative and dialogical methods as a possible path towards new forms of research and political praxis. Since such changes in urban research and praxis directly impact academic work, calls to build urban knowledge otherwise often entail engaging with institutional inertia and opposition.

In this double-session co-organized with Anke Schwarz, we host a number of invited contributions by urban scholars who draw on their own research to discuss the experiences, practical consequences and difficulties of integrating decentred approaches in knowledge production, pedagogy and academic praxis of urban geography.

Paper session Wednesday 1 September 1pm to 2:40 pm BST

In the paper session, contributors (Wangui Kimari, William Ackah, Lindsay Sawyer, María Antonia Carcelen Estrada) lay out practical experiences with the ongoing work of decentering urban geography. The lead question is: What ideas and examples for transforming both the knowledge and the practices of urban geography are emergent in your work and praxis? The discussion includes reflections on empirical research, academic writing, editorial and curatorial activities, and teaching.

Panel session Wednesday 1 September 3pm to 4:40 pm BST

In a subsequent panel session, the panellists (Gabriela Ruales and Manuela Silveira of the Colectivo de Geografía Crítica de Ecuador, Noa K. Ha, Sophie Oldfield) will address concerns about forms of critique and theory, but particularly engage with institutional challenges, practices of circulating knowledge, and the potentials and difficulties of more collaborative academic work to further decentre urban geography. With a view to their own ongoing efforts and experience in decentering urban geography, panellists are invited to discuss the following questions: What is ‘decentering urban geography’ to you? How would you frame it? How does this approach influence your academic praxis? In what ways does it change the way you work? What has to be done to further decentre urban geography? Where do we go from here?

Sessions sponsored by the Gender and Feminist Geographies Research Group and the Urban Geography Research Group