Page 3 of 17

Territorial subjectivities. The missing link between political subjectivity and territorialization

Progress in Human Geography – 2024

Political subjectivity and territorialization often appear disconnected in recent debates. We propose a fresh approach based on Latin American scholarship to understand subjects and territories as relational: Subjects are (de)stabilized in processes of territorialization, while territories are (de)stabilized in processes of subject formation. We introduce the concept of territorial subjectivities and use examples from the literature to show how these emerge in Berlin, Buenos Aires, and Dresden. Placing an analytical focus on becoming rather than being, the contingency of territorial subjectivities is key to this novel conceptual link that supports a differentiated reading of socio-territorial struggles in diverse geographical contexts.

Schwarz, Anke and Monika Streule (2024) Territorial subjectivities. The missing link between political subjectivity and territorialization. Progress in Human Geography 48.3, 275–291. DOI: 10.1177/03091325241228600

Read article

How to compare specificity, build concepts, and change theory: A creative methodology to grasp urbanization processes

FQS – 2023

In a range of comparative methods that have emerged in recent years, scholars were increasingly drawing on innovative approaches to engage with today’s diverse and complex urban worlds. Yet few researchers to date—in the field of urban studies or in spatial disciplines in general—have focused on the design and implementation of comparative inquiry. With this article, I seek to contribute to these current debates by presenting the specific methodology developed in the framework of the research project Patterns and Pathways of Planetary Urbanization. The main questions are: How can the spatiality of large urban territories be empirically studied? How can urbanization processes be analyzed comparatively? To tackle these questions, I focus on our experiences of putting the comparative procedure to work, drawing on a complementary set of ethnographic, cartographic, and historiographic methods useful for a creative, transdisciplinary, and more collaborative study of urbanization. I conclude with a call for a broad discussion of methodology and its theoretical implications by emphasizing the intrinsic link between crafting new methods and the generation of comparative concepts.

Streule, Monika (2023) How to compare specificity, build concepts, and change theory: A creative methodology to grasp urbanization processes. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(3), Art. 11. DOI: 10.17169/fqs-24.3.4016

Read article

Difference, intersectionality and territorialisation

Keynote at CLAS University of Cambridge – 2023

This keynote discusses territorial subjectivity as a tool to analyse the formation of subjects through territorialization, with a special focus on difference and intersectionality. Following Alicia Lindón who coined this notion in her study of Mexico City, I understand territorial subjectivities as a recurrent process in which territorial ideas, meanings and imaginaries as well as territorial practices provide a strong framework of reference for the becoming of subjects. To illustrate this, I will use case studies from Berlin and Buenos Aires. I conclude with a reflection on a more complex understanding of socio-territorial relations imbedded in the making of territory.

International Conference: Intersectional Inequalities and (post-)Covid Urban Spaces

Date: 20 and 21 June 2023

Location: Alison Richard Building SG2, Centre of Latin American Studies, University of Cambridge

Decolonial Cities Beyond Justice

Decolonial Cities Collective – 2023

Decolonial Cities Collective’s first Dialogue event was a virtual conversation between Heather Dorries (University of Toronto) and Monika Streule (LSE), and Bobby Farnan (University of York) and Dena Qaddumi (LSE). In this dialogue, we discuss how centring the ‘decolonial city’ can pluralise conceptions of justice and the ‘good city’. In particular, we ask:

  • How do decolonial approaches shift conceptions of the ‘good city’?
  • How do distributive, procedural, and recognition justice frameworks inform and limit the horizon of the decolonial city?
  • How does centring decoloniality pluralise conceptions of justice in the city through registers such as abolition, care, indigeneity, and ecology?

Watch the video recording of the event here. The dialogue was held online on 19 April 2023, 15:00-16:30