Seite 14 von 20

Poner las cartas sobre la mesa: Karten kollektiv lesen für eine kritische kartographische Wissensproduktion in der Stadtforschung

Mexiko-Stadt – 2019

(Zusammenfassung in Englisch)

Mapping is an ever-present tool for transdisciplinary and critical urban research, which is met with interest not only in the social sciences, but also in the framework of artistic and/or activist research projects. Mexico City with its dense fabric, social heterogeneity, and simultaneous existing and traceable multi-layered historical references, i.e. colonialities and modernities, offers a paradigmatic research field to further develop much needed novel mapping tools in current urban studies. When confronted with such complex urbanization processes and diverse social realities existing side-by-side, maps are particularly appropriate as an experimental method for visualizing qualitative data and translating it into spatial representations. It is through this process of translation and mapping that knowledge is generated. Unlike text, maps can address complex contexts by representing theses that can be visually ‚read‘ at the first glance. Mapping is therefore particularly suited to conveying results of analyses – and to imagining different realities. Additionally, maps can draw attention to connections that only become visible once they are visualized topographically. Not least, this spatialization of knowledge makes it possible to develop a different understanding of urbanity within and beyond the specificity of the Mexican Megalopolis, and to consider another possible urban future.

The invited mapping projects that will be introduced and discussed demonstrate, through concrete urban case studies, just how diverse and innovative mapping methods can be. This is particularly the case when applied in both today’s urban research and daily political praxis. The aim of the workshop is to extract and convey such methods. In doing so, the communication of methodical knowledge will play a central role. Working with the example of concrete mappings, we will practice a collaborative and dialogical process, questioning and further developing methods of urban research. While making public and developing mapping processes collaboratively – working via the suggested process of re-reading maps – we will put mapping to use, addressing urgent questions currently relevant to Mexico City, such as divers processes of massive urban reinvestment, gendered violence against women*, or the Mexican everyday reality of threating earthquakes and floods. In this sense, the workshop should contribute a collective and participatory process of knowledge-production, opening scope for action through urban interventions.

Co-chair and convener of the seminar and workshop (with Kathrin Wildner, HafenCity University, and Christof Göbel, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Azcapotzalco, Mexico City, January 14–19, 2019

Ethnografie urbaner Territorien: Metropolitane Urbanisierungsprozesse von Mexiko-Stadt

Westfälisches Dampfboot – 2018

Ethnografie urbaner Territorien lädt buchstäblich ein, durch die Straßen von Mexiko-Stadt zu streifen. In ihrer Auseinandersetzung mit urbanen Produktions- und Aneignungsprozessen nimmt Monika Streule eine sozioterritoriale Perspektive auf tief eingeschriebene gesellschaftliche Machtverhältnisse ein. Für den ungewöhnlichen metropolitanen Maßstab ihrer qualitativ-empirischen Studie entwickelt sie theoretische Konzepte sowie transdisziplinär angelegte methodische Verfahren einer kritischen Stadtforschung und zeigt deren Anwendungsmöglichkeiten auf.

Doing mobile ethnography: Grounded, situated, and comparative

Urban Studies – 2020

This paper explores and discusses the experimental, critical, and self-reflective use of differing methods in urban studies. In the context of frequent calls to investigate urban processes in a planetary and comparative perspective, the empirical groundedness of research is among the particularly complex challenges urban scholars are confronted with. The key question is: how can qualitative-empirical methods, like ethnography or qualitative mapping, be adapted to explore contemporary urban conditions?

This paper seeks to contribute to current debates by introducing a specific methodological design of a mobile ethnography that enables an analysis of large and heterogeneous urban territories, in three main ways: first, by offering a theoretically informed and empirically grounded transductive research design, second, by proposing a complementary set of cartographic, historiographic and comparative methods of which mobile ethnography is a part of, and third, by suggesting post- and decolonial methodological perspectives, both conceptually by engaging with Latin American urbanisms, as well as empirically by furthering collaborative ways of knowledge production.

To conclude, the paper stresses the need to continually develop new inventive methods for comparative urban research, for two main reasons: (1) to enable scholars to question established geographical representations and parochial imaginaries of urban space, and (2) to problematize methodological and theoretical dogmas with situated knowledge. By suggesting different representations of the urban, the paper thus emphasises how important it is to transductively entangle empirical and theoretical conceptualizations to further decentre urban knowledge production.

Streule, Monika (2020) Doing mobile ethnography: Grounded, situated, and comparative. Urban Studies, 57.2, 421–438. DOI 10.1177/0042098018817418

Artikel lesen (in Englisch)

Comparative cartographies: Urban processes within and across metropolitan territories

AAG Konferenz Washington DC – 2019

(Zusammenfassung in Englisch)

This paper seeks to respond to the growing prominence of post- and decolonial thoughts in the field of urban studies and the methodological consequences this critical engagement brings to the fore. Focusing on the entangled and relational character of urbanization, established concepts and more orthodox methodologies have to be rethought, revised, and rebuilt. In this context, the paper highlights the particular importance of methods in regard to comparative urbanism – given the openness and interdisciplinary character of the field itself – and invites to reflect on collaborative, dialogical and experimental ways of knowledge production across different urban worlds.

To this end, the paper places critical cartography and mapping tools both at the centre of attempts to understand and represent urbanization and as conceptual space to rethink comparative methodologies in urban studies more broadly. Taking the reflection on decolonizing methods as a starting point to collaboratively rethink the potentials and constraints mapping harbours for a critical urban research agenda and as a valuable tool to understand urbanisation as a dynamic, open ended and contested process of global transformation.

Paper presented at the Session Building new concepts in urban studies: Challenges and tactics in comparative urbanism, AAG Annual Meeting 2019, April 3–7, Washington DC